SciMed Ring Pessary vs Uresta — 2026 Comparison

Uresta is a bladder-support device marketed primarily for stress urinary incontinence (SUI). SciMed silicone ring pessaries are traditional pessary devices used for both pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence. This objective 2026 comparison covers the key differences — they're not quite the same device category — and which is right for your specific clinical scenario.

The traditional ring pessary alternative

SciMed Silicone Ring Pessary With Support

Support diaphragm for SUI + prolapse · Sizes 0-8 · From $49.99 · Direct from San Jose CA

View sizes →

Quick verdict — which fits your situation?

  • You have pelvic organ prolapse (POP): SciMed ring pessary. Uresta is not FDA-cleared or indicated for prolapse.
  • You have stress urinary incontinence only (no prolapse): Either could work. SciMed with-support ring is $49.99 vs Uresta ~$400-$500. Both address SUI mechanically.
  • You have both prolapse AND stress incontinence: SciMed ring with support. Handles both.
  • You want a device you can insert/remove daily for activity only: Uresta's ergonomic design may suit occasional use. SciMed ring is designed for continuous wear.
  • Budget matters: SciMed. 10x cheaper for functionally similar clinical benefit in the SUI use case.

Different device categories — the key distinction

These aren't apples-to-apples devices:

  • SciMed Ring Pessary is a classical pessary — a support device sitting behind the pubic bone that lifts pelvic organs. Used for POP, SUI, or both. FDA-cleared Class II under Product Code HHN. Widely prescribed by OB-GYNs and urogynecologists.
  • Uresta is a bladder-support device with a specific proprietary shape (a bulb-and-stem design) designed primarily to support the urethra and prevent stress leakage. FDA-cleared for stress urinary incontinence only. Not indicated for pelvic organ prolapse.

Materials and design

Factor SciMed Ring Pessary Uresta
Device shape Ring (traditional pessary form) Bulb-and-stem (proprietary bladder-support shape)
Material Medical-grade silicone Medical-grade silicone
FDA cleared for POP Yes No
FDA cleared for SUI Yes (with-support model) Yes
Sizing 10 sizes (0-9) 3 sizes typically (S, M, L)
Continuous wear Yes (designed for it) Yes, though many users wear situationally
Prescription required No (direct to patient) Yes in some regions; direct-to-consumer in others
Insertion technique Fold and insert (like a diaphragm) Applicator-assisted insertion

Pricing

Product SciMed direct Uresta patient price
Single device (correct size) $49.99 ~$400-$500 USD
Try-multiple-sizes package $129.99 (3 sizes) Not offered
Cost ratio SciMed is roughly 1/8 to 1/10 the cost of Uresta for a comparable-purpose device.

When Uresta might be the better choice

  • You've tried a ring pessary and specifically found it uncomfortable
  • You want the ergonomic bulb-and-stem shape and are willing to pay for it
  • You have SUI only (no prolapse) AND you specifically want daytime-only wear pattern with applicator insertion
  • Cost is not a factor

When SciMed is the better choice

  • You have any degree of pelvic organ prolapse (Uresta not indicated)
  • You have SUI and want the most cost-effective FDA-cleared solution
  • You need to try multiple sizes to find the right fit (SciMed Fitting Pack)
  • Budget matters
  • You want direct patient purchase without prescription flow
  • You want a device with 60+ years of clinical track record (ring pessary vs Uresta's newer design)
  • Your OB-GYN or urogynecologist recommends a ring pessary specifically

Clinical evidence comparison

Ring pessaries have been in continuous clinical use for >100 years with decades of published evidence on efficacy for POP and SUI. ACOG Practice Bulletin 214 (2019) recommends pessaries as first-line non-surgical treatment for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse.

Uresta is newer (approved ~2016) with a smaller published evidence base focused on SUI. Both are safe and effective for their labeled indications.

Frequently asked questions

Can I use Uresta for pelvic organ prolapse?

No. Uresta is FDA-cleared for stress urinary incontinence only. It's not indicated or designed for prolapse. For prolapse, use a ring pessary or consult your provider for a pessary type that matches your prolapse grade (Gellhorn, donut, ring, etc.).

Which has better clinical evidence?

Ring pessaries have >100 years of use and extensive published evidence. Uresta is newer with narrower published evidence focused on SUI. Both work for their indications.

Can I try SciMed ring first before spending on Uresta?

Yes. Many patients try SciMed's Fitting Pack ($129.99 for 3 sizes) before considering more expensive devices. If a ring pessary works, you've saved $300-$400.

Is Uresta covered by insurance?

Coverage varies by insurance plan and region. Uresta is direct-to-consumer in many markets, meaning out-of-pocket for most patients. SciMed is also direct-to-consumer, HSA/FSA eligible.

Do OB-GYNs recommend Uresta?

Some do, particularly for isolated SUI in patients who want a specific ergonomic design. Most OB-GYNs still recommend traditional ring pessaries first because of cost, evidence base, and versatility (handles both POP and SUI).

Can I switch between SciMed and Uresta?

Yes. They are different devices with different insertion techniques. Either can be discontinued at any time. Many patients try both to see which they prefer.

Related reading

Traditional ring pessary — 10x cheaper for comparable SUI benefit

Ships from San Jose · 30-day exchange · HSA/FSA eligible

Back to blog